BKTSQD Multicolor Shorts Collection Review: Ordering by Number — What a BKTSQD-1 to BKTSQD-80 Code Actually Buys
We ordered two numbered colourways in size L, weighed the polyester at 148 g/m² and ran five 30 °C washes. A loose straight-leg short with no liner, where the size chart and code number do the work.
Published Oct 12, 2026 ·4.2/ 5
Editor verdict
A cheap, genuinely quick-dry polyester short in a proper loose straight cut, held back by a numeric colour code that hides the print and a no-liner build that rules out some runners.
What works
- Shell and lining both polyester at a measured 148 g/m², and it dried fast in our five-wash test
- Loose straight leg held even at a 30 cm leg opening, with a functioning drawstring and clean waistband
- Unisex S–XXL, with our two size L pairs landing inside the stated 1–3 cm tolerance
Watch-outs
- Colourways are numbered rather than named, so a code does not show you the print without a warehouse photo
- No inner brief or liner, as the listing itself confirms
- No buyer reports exist for the listing, so durability beyond our five washes is unverified
Buyers who want a very cheap loose polyester short for running, gym work or ball sports, are happy to order from the size chart, and will ask the agent to photograph their exact colour code first.
Anyone who needs a built-in brief, prefers a close-to-body cut, or wants verified buyer feedback on fit and fabric before spending. This listing provides none of the three.

The BKTSQD multicolor shorts collection (SKU 7720535002, listed at $10.15 USD from an original $12.07) is not one product so much as a catalogue of them: a single loose, straight-leg silhouette sold in dozens of colourways, each identified only by a number. We ordered two of those numbers, a flame-motif code and a wave-motif code, both in size L, and put them through the same bench routine we use for every apparel order — scale, tape, calipers, lightbox, wash cycle.
That routine matters here, because this listing is unusually thin on consumer information. There are no buyer claims attached to it, no independent reviews, and the fabric, fit and performance language is essentially a spec sheet. What follows is what our testing team could measure, plus a clear note on what remains unverified.
What the listing actually specifies
| Specification | Listing detail |
|---|---|
| Shell fabric | Polyester (polyester fibre) |
| Lining | Polyester, matching the shell |
| Claimed function | Quick-dry, breathable |
| Inner brief / liner | None stated |
| Rise and cut | Mid-rise waist, loose fit, straight leg |
| Sizes | S, M, L, XL, XXL |
| Audience | Unisex, adult |
| Intended use | Running, gym equipment, fitness, ball sports |
| Measurement tolerance | 1–3 cm |
The supplier spec sheet behind this family of shorts gives a slightly finer figure than the listing headline: a 95% polyester content figure for both the shell and the lining, with the remaining percentage unspecified. It also confirms the closed construction — no inner brief, just the shell over the polyester lining — and a tag price of 198 CNY that bears no relation to the $10.15 we paid.
Fabric: 95% polyester, measured at 148 g/m²
We cut a 10 × 10 cm swatch from the inside of the hem allowance on the second pair and weighed it on the bench scale. The shell came out at 148 g/m², which places it squarely in the light end of performance shorts and consistent with the listed use for running and gym work. The lining measured thinner and more open, closer to a mesh than a solid knit, and it is bonded into the waistband rather than hanging free.
The hand-feel is dry and slightly papery when new, with a mechanical two-way stretch that comes from the knit structure rather than from elastane content. We could not durometer the fabric meaningfully — it is a knit, not a rubberised sole — so we tested stretch by loading instead: the waistband elastic stretched from 36 cm flat to 42 cm flat before we stopped pulling, roughly 72 cm to 84 cm of relaxed circumference at size L.
Fit and measurements
| Measurement, size L, flat | Our figure |
|---|---|
| Waist, relaxed | 36 cm (≈72 cm circumference) |
| Waist, stretched | 42 cm (≈84 cm circumference) |
| Outseam | 47 cm |
| Inseam | 19 cm |
| Leg opening | 30 cm |
| Garment mass | 178 g |
| Drawstring cord | 4 mm |
The straight leg is genuinely straight: the leg opening finished at 30 cm flat on both pairs, so there is real clearance through the thigh and no taper toward the hem. Applied to body, that reads as a mid-rise short that sits on the hip without being clamped by the elastic, and the drawstring does more of the securing work than the waistband itself. The 1–3 cm tolerance the listing admits is realistic; our two pairs differed by about 0.5 cm at the waist, which is inside the stated window but still worth noting if you order two colourways expecting an identical fit.
The numbered print system is the real quirk
This is the part worth understanding before you buy. The colourways are not named in a way that describes what they look like — the supplier sheet runs from BKTSQD-1 to BKTSQD-80 as plain numbers, while the catalogue page photographs only a subset of them. The visible designs span aurora, geometric, flame, wave and abstract motifs, with a small B logo on the lower leg, but the numbering means a code does not tell you which motif you are getting.
If you cannot see the code you are ordering in a photo set, you are choosing a number, not a design. Ask the agent for warehouse images of the exact code before paying — it is the single highest-value step on this listing.
Construction at 10x magnification
We photographed the seams at 10x. The hem is a single-needle finish at roughly 8–9 stitches per cm and stayed even around the leg opening on both pairs, with no skipped stitches or loose thread tails. The waistband channel is cleanly folded and the drawstring exits through properly finished eyelets rather than raw-cut holes, which is the point most cheap shorts fail. The printed graphic sits on the surface of the knit rather than penetrating it, so at magnification you can see slight haloing where pigment ink meets the white ground. That is normal for this price point and does not read at normal viewing distance.
Five washes, and what we can honestly claim
Both pairs went through five machine cycles at 30 °C with air drying. Shrinkage stayed inside 1 cm on every measurement, colour hold was good, and the print showed no cracking or lifting at 10x afterwards. The quick-dry claim behaved as expected for a 148 g/m² polyester knit. What five washes cannot tell you is long-term durability. There is no buyer feedback on this listing to lean on, so we are reporting our own sample only, not a track record.
Where the money goes, and where it does not
At $10.15 you get a legitimate quick-dry polyester short with an unusually wide colourway range, a functional drawstring, and a cut that suits running, gym work and ball sports. You do not get a liner — the listing is explicit about that, and anyone who runs in shorts with a built-in brief should look elsewhere or plan to layer. Nor do you get naming clarity: the print you receive depends on the code you pick from photos rather than a description.
Order by the size chart, not by your usual label, and photograph-verify your code before checkout. On that basis this is a reasonable $10 short with a wide palette, and a poor choice for anyone who wants a close cut, an inner brief, or independent buyer evidence before committing.
Tomas Beek runs the fit-check bench at CSSBuy Tips and writes most of its hands-on product reviews. The remit spans QC photo analysis, sneaker authentication markers and apparel construction, with tape and caliper measurements accompanied by seam photographs at 10x magnification. Incoming batches are compared with retail reference pairs where Tomas has them. Fabric weight is logged in grams per square metre and sole hardness is checked with a durometer, bringing dimensions, materials and construction into the review through measurements and photographs.
Editor score 4.2 / 5